Seagaard ChessReviews - Review ChessBooks and Chesssoftware

Home

Books

Software

Publisher

Author

Newsletter

Forum

ChessStores

About

Links

Search

Chess Informant 83 from the publisher "Chess Informant"

Books > BO-Periodical More reviews from this authorMore reviews from this publisher

Title: Chess Informant 83 Author: Chess Informant
Language: Pages: 398
Cover: Paperback Published: 2002
Publisher: Chess Informant Homepage: http://www.sahovski.com/
Price: £ 18,00 (Book+CD: £ 22,00) ISSN: 0351 1375
Reviewed by: Soren Sogaard Date: 26/5 2002

 

 

QuickReview

For this review, I didn't receive the electronic version of the new Chess Informant so I only take a quick look at the book. In the last review of Chess Informant 82, I looked at some minor problems using the software from Chess Informant. As I don't have the new Software I don't know if these things are fixed, but according to Chess Informant website, it still cost £ 18 to buy Chess Informant Reader 2.1+. You can also download a free beta version of "Chess Informant Expert", but it is good to know that the size of this version is 10 Mb! The free beta version is a trial version and can only be used for 60 days. I still think it is a bad move to take money for things like  pgn-format etc. I hope Chess Informant will change it in the future so it will be free for subscribers of this popular product. Well, back to the book!

There are not many changes (if any) in the book since the last edition, except that the games and tournaments of course are different ;-) I don't know if the team behind Chess Informant read my last review, but they in fact decreased the number of endgames. I still think that there shouldn't be any endgames in this opening book, I very much doubt that there is many who look at these 6-7 pages. The annotators are still some of the best players in the world including Kasparov, Kramnik, Anand, M. Adams, Morozevich, R. Ponomariov, Ivanchuk, Shirov, Lékó, Bareev... So the quality of the analysis is still very good. I only found one minor thing that I think could have been better. Sometimes there are some editorial comments (which is OK), but when it is given at move 1, I think it would have been better to give it as a single game. Take a look at this example from game 8:

Li Wenliang - Ponomariov
Moscow 2001
1.b3 [1.c4 e5 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 c6 4.d4 Bb4 5.Bd2 Bxd2 6......(22 moves!)

Game 8: Annotated by the editorial team.

 

Content

  • Tournaments and games between October 1st, 2001 and January 31st, 2002
  • The 10 best games
  • The 10 most important novelties and 3 pages with theory covering the most important novelty
  • 548 annotated games and 643 fragments
  • Tournaments includes: Hoogeveen, Yerevan, León, Moscow, Pamplona, USA (ch), Wijk aan Zee, match Kramnik - G. Kasparov, FIDE WC Ponomariov - Ivanchuk...
  • Tournament tables
  • 9 Endgames and 27 Combinations
  • "The Best of Chess Informant - Jan Timman" (20 pages). Games, Endgames, Combinations, photos and statistics

 

The best game

The best game from Chess Informant 81 is from Dortmund, and was played between the two World Champions Kramnik and Anand. I was in Dortmund and saw the game, and even though I was very impressed by Kramnik I'm really surprised that it was chosen as the best game. The reason is that Anand was playing way below his standard, but I have to admit that Kramnik was very determined as he sat down to play this game. The key moment in this game was of course 15.d5!, and the game quickly ended (Anand had as far as I remember over 1 hour left at the clock when he resigned at move 39!).

Kramnik - Anand
Dortmund 2001
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.0–0 a6 7.Bb3 cxd4 8.exd4 Nc6 9.Nc3 Be7 10.Bg5 0–0 11.Qd2 Na5 12.Bc2 b5 13.Qf4 Ra7 14.Rad1 Bb7 15.d5!

Although Anand found a couple of only moves after this, it is my impression that most of the spectators in the playing hall thought that Kramnik would win this position.

The bottom line is that there have not been many changes in this issue, and that Chess Informant still is one of the best periodicals around. I hope that the team behind Chess Informant will develop their software further, and that subscribers doesn't have to pay for using the "Expert Reader".

 

 E-mail

Copyright © 2000 - 2011 by seagaard

To top of page